Intel Celeron N3160 vs AMD FX-4100
On the Atlas performance index the AMD FX-4100 is about 16% faster. They launched 5 years apart.
Intel Celeron N316057
AMD FX-410066
| Intel Celeron N3160 | AMD FX-4100 | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2016 | 2011 |
| Family | Braswell | Bulldozer Core |
| Cores | 4 | 4 |
| Threads | – | – |
| Clock | 1600 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Process | – | – |
| Power (TDP) | 6 W | 95 W |
| Launch price | $107 | $115 |
| Performance index | 57 | 66 |
Green marks the better value in each row. Less power, a smaller process and a lower price count as better.
More comparisons
Intel Celeron N3160 vs AMD Athlon 53502014 · index 57Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron 63052020 · index 57Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron 6305E2020 · index 57Intel Celeron N3160 vs Intel Celeron J31602016 · index 57AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Celeron G4900T2018 · index 66AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Celeron N45052021 · index 66AMD FX-4100 vs AMD Athlon X4 7302012 · index 65AMD FX-4100 vs Intel Celeron 5305U2020 · index 67