Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron N2807
On the Atlas performance index the Intel Celeron E3400 is about 0% faster. They launched 4 years apart.
Intel Celeron E340032
Intel Celeron N280732
| Intel Celeron E3400 | Intel Celeron N2807 | |
|---|---|---|
| Released | 2010 | 2014 |
| Family | Celeron | Bay Trail-M |
| Cores | 2 | 2 |
| Threads | – | – |
| Clock | 2600 MHz | 1580 MHz |
| Process | – | – |
| Power (TDP) | 65 W | 4 W |
| Launch price | $53 | $107 |
| Performance index | 32 | 32 |
Green marks the better value in each row. Less power, a smaller process and a lower price count as better.
More comparisons
Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron 1000M2013 · index 32Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron 1037U2013 · index 32Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron N28082014 · index 32Intel Celeron E3400 vs Intel Celeron N40002017 · index 32Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron 1000M2013 · index 32Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron 1037U2013 · index 32Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N28082014 · index 32Intel Celeron N2807 vs Intel Celeron N40002017 · index 32